Proafile v5.0 | Updated: Sep 21, 2008

Portfolio Proas

Samwise - Part 3

Posted by on 03/12 at 10:33 PM
The third (and hopefully final) iteration of Samwise the micro-cruising proa.


Some fairly dramatic changes since Samwise Part 2 (Part 1 is here). The biggest change is that Sam is now a balls out Atlantic proa - rig placed in the windward hull. No faux Pacific, "weight to windward" sham, an Atlantic proa is Sam I am. Larger pics after the jump.


LOA: 20'
BOA: 8' - 12'
Windward hull beam: 2'-10"
SA: 180 sq. ft.
Mast height: 16'-2"
Rig height: 19'

Placing the rig in the windward hull solves several problems:

1. Aligns CE of sail and leeboard for proper balance. The force resultant of the rig now aligns with the leeboard, solving the weather helm, and making sail steering a much more likely proposition.

2. The windward hull is a larger box section, creating a sturdier base and more bury for the free-standing masts. Freeing the leeward hull of the need to carry the rig means it can be built lower and lighter.

3. Sail handling will be far more manageable with the crew within easy reach. Now I can shake the sail and pop a batten simply by grabbing the boom with my hand. Rigging, reefing and furling can all be done while standing in the cockpit.

Speaking of the rig, the planform is now so close to the theoretically ideal ellipse it could make a Spitfire jealous. Not bad for a standing lug! The sails are still slab reefed (all the way up to the third batten).



Foiled Again



Last week I was perusing some old AYRS papers looking for proa ideas, and they reminded me how cool Bruce foils are. My own tests with Bruce foils were extremely convincing - the models sailed flat, fast and true. So throwing my usual caution to the winds, I've drawn Sam with a force balancing hydrofoil. The purpose of the Bruce foil isn't to lift the hull, but to keep if from submerging - "balancing" the heeling force of the rig. The leeward hull can theoretically be reduced to almost nothing - just enough to support the hydrofoil in transient wind conditions. That may be so, but I'm taking the belt and suspenders approach with Sam - big lee hull. That said, 24 feet now seems like overkill, especially since a nice trailering package is an important goal. So Sam's leeward hull is 20' - same as the other. I don't mind the weight/cost savings either.

To make sure the CE is dead on for all points of sail, the foil is adjustable fore and aft via traveler cars on an 8' Harken track. I intend some sort of shock chord arrangement (TBD) that allows the foil to slide aft if/when it hits the bottom. The foil completely retracts for beaching and trailering.


The sliding crossbeams adjust beam from 8' to 12'. Actual sailing beam will vary because the Bruce foil is sensitive to overall beam. Too wide and the foil lifts out (making too much leeway). Too narrow and the foil buries. Beam will also adjust inwards when the sails are reefed. I don't imagine constant beam adjustment while sailing, simply set the correct beam for the current sail area, and go sailing.

I've refined the hull shape a bit. Attractive as the flat-bottom sharpie simplicity is, I'm thinking hull shape is probably not the wisest place to make a huge compromise - the name is SamWISE after all. The five panel hull gives a wider beam at the deck for a more comfortable interior, a narrower waterline, a more rounded section for reduced surface area, and best of all, the surface area and waterline beam will gracefully diminish as the hull unweights in stronger winds.

I've drawn Sam without the fully enclosed cabin this time around. Dodgers with vinyl windows fore and aft stop the spray, and overhead canvas would protect against excessive sun or rain. This would put Sam in the popular and rugged "open boat" category. It would also make oars a distinct possibility for auxiliary power. Puget Sound gets more than its share of dead flat calms, and the new hull shape would row pretty well. As the price of oil continues it's inexorable climb ($111/barrel today!), the swarm of cruising powerboats grows ever thinner. Soon it may be possible to row a small boat through the San Juan islands without the constant accompaniment of droning engines, diesel fumes and boat wakes.

Comments

  • I felt compelled to write as I have followed your conceptual design with interest. I like you MkIII rig. Some of the early European/N.American sailing canoes were lug rigged, a few of which had a curved gaff. I think that would enhance you rig even more. Having read through the GIS website with interst with regard to the lug rig, here is another site that adds weight to the performance of the lug sail.  The Apple dinghy design can even carry two lug sails which are mentioned as being very powerful......... http://www.campionboats.co.uk/ At the present time I am more inclined towards the WTW concept and current sail a 27’6” catamaran, but not with lug sails.
    As I write, my dinning room table is covered with sketches of lug rigged proas inspired by your concept. All the best.

    Posted by  on  03/15  at  02:06 PM
  • Hi Richard, great comments. I love those old sailing canoes and their “batwing” sails. Thanks for the link to the Apple dinghy - great boat!

    Posted by  on  03/15  at  03:41 PM
  • Yes, I also feel bruce foils are so cool. However, having to adjust the boat beam does not seem so cool. What about changing (ajusting) the inclination of the foil? I have done some experiments and I think it is easy feasible. The angle can be adjusted while sailing if necesary. Furthermore, by using a pair of tandem foils, and managing diferntly the fore and the rear foil, the boat can be steered.. Regards,

    Posted by  on  03/21  at  03:42 PM
  • Hi Fulgencio. Actually, I thought using using adjustable beam to refine the hydrofoil’s stabilizing effect was quite elegant, because the trailering aspect of the design requires adjustable beam anyway. Utilizing an already existing action for another purpose IS cool. That said, adjusting the inclination would be fine also…

    There is theoretically no difference between sliding a single foil fore and aft or adjusting two different foils. Both are viable solutions, the choice comes down to which is easier to build and operate. I think only testing will answer that. Model competition?

    Posted by  on  03/28  at  10:07 PM
  • Yes, may be yes Model competition. Ypu allways have a very positive point of view. In fact your comments and new Sam idea has made me to take hands again on my old models. I will let you know.

    Posted by  on  03/30  at  11:21 AM
  • I did it:

    Yahoo proa_file 6. Click on twin foil proa.

    Posted by  on  04/15  at  08:55 AM
  • Fulgencio, it’s brilliant! I like how the angle of the foil is controlled via one line that is kept in tension by the hydrodynamic force created by the foil. Like I said, brilliant.

    It seems to work great! Did you test on all points of sail?

    Posted by  on  04/15  at  05:55 PM
  • I did it with former models, first with a towed one, later with a model which had a wing sail. That model had also radio control but the servos were not powerful enough for shunting. Nevertheless I succeded changing course by acting with the foils, this is gouverning the boat.
    See http://groups.yahoo.com/group/proa_file/files/Twin foil steering/

    And the corresponding photos:

    http://ph.groups.yahoo.com/group/proa_file/photos/browse/d6f5

    Posted by  on  04/16  at  03:45 AM
  • Sorry for relaying on my memory. I have revieved the photos and remembered that finally I could shunt. I changed to a canard controlled wing sail, and controlled the canard with a small servo. As the sail kept a constan angle with the relative wind, I only had to change the canard to the opposite side and the model shunted.

    Posted by  on  04/16  at  03:54 AM
  • I’m very taken with your design, Fulgencio. It adjusts the foils to create more vertical force in the bow and more lateral force at the stern, which is exactly what is desired for a schooner rigged proa. It’s also mechanically simple and easily fabricated. The only problem (but major one) I see for my own uses is that it is not retractable for beaching or the trailer.

    Posted by  on  04/18  at  08:40 AM
  • Yes, tha is the major problem of all the hydrofoil crafts. I only can propose some kind of clip on solution for the foils. these would be clim on to the hinges. I thing I did a sketch of the solution in one of the photos of http://ph.groups.yahoo.com/group/proa_file/photos/browse/d6f5
    The clip could be open right down or better perhaps at 45ยบ to leeward.

    I am happy to have found an experienced proaman interested on my works.

    Regards,

    Fulgencio

    Posted by  on  04/18  at  10:09 AM

Post a New Comment

Name:

Email:

URL:

Smileys

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Submit the word you see below: